BRAVO! LEED v3.0 LOOKS AT THE BIG PICTURE IN GREEN BUILDINGS + LETS YOU LOOK TOO

February 4, 2009 on 12:12 am | In Fascinating Information, Lenders + Vendors, New Developments, Trends, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

BRAVO! LEED v3.0 LOOKS AT THE BIG PICTURE IN GREEN BUILDINGS + LETS YOU LOOK TOO

By Jodi Summers

LEED v3.0 – the U.S. Green Building Council’s latest green buildings rating system, has a brave new focus – saving energy on the long term.

“This version reflects the rapid advancements in building science and technology and provides incentives for strategies that have greater positive impacts on energy efficiency and CO2 emissions reductions, among other priorities,” notes treehugger.com.

Known around town as LEED 2009, what’s piquing the interest of the saving-money-thru-green-minded is a new requirement that focuses on facility maintenance during the life span of the building. The new rules mandate that energy and water usage for buildings seeking LEED certification now has to be reported for at least five years.

“One of the major differences with the new rating system is that sharing and reporting this energy use data is now required, as it was optional in the previous rating system,” observed property manager Michael Martz.

USGBC will allow projects to comply with the requirement in any of three ways:

1. To renew LEED certification every two years using LEED for Existing Buildings: Operation and Maintenance.

2. Provide energy and water usage data for the building on an ongoing basis annually.

3. The owner of the property authorizes USGBC to access the building’s energy and water usage data directly from the building’s utility provider.

With LEED v3.0, the USGBC offers a more savvy point rating system. The LEED rating system is increasing from a total of 69 points to 100 points – with an emphasis on what matters most from an environmental standpoint – energy efficiency and CO2 reductions. It the early days, a building could earn the same number of points for installing a commuter bike rack as optimizing energy by 10% or reducing water usage by 20%. Now credits are weighed based on how the course of action improves environmental and sapient health.

The LEED v3.0 vision also does a superior job of calculating the value of refurbishing the value of existing buildings. LEED v3.0 looks at the BIG picture.

Part of USGBC’s goal is to help owners and operators optimize building performance over the building’s lifetime. LEED v3.0 goes with the theory that collecting data is the best way to identify and help correct the common gap between energy modeling during the design phase and the building’s actual energy usage.

For those already constructing or managing LEED-certified buildings, the new requirements won’t be much of a change. Add-ons to current building systems will increase front-end costs a bit, but the big upside is that owners can now micromonitor energy usage. This investment will offer a significant savings in energy usage over the life of the building.

“They can see when the energy use has peaked, when it’s at the low, when it’s at the mean, and then they can adjust their programs or their overall systems,” explains Martz.

With LEED v3.Going forward, small businesses will be able to monitor their energy usage with the sophistication of institutions that consume a lot of energy, such as universities, skyscrapers and industrial manufacturers.

**

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/05/leed-30-is-launched.php

http://blogs.nationaltrust.org/preservationnation/?p=525

http://www.socalindustrialrealestateblog.com/?p=407

http://www.usgbc.org/News/USGBCInTheNewsDetails.aspx?ID=2628

http://www.mlive.com/business/west-michigan/index.ssf/2009/08/leed_reporting_requirement_goo.html

http://www.constructionweekonline.com/pictures/gallery/Stock/green.buildings.jpg

http://www.eco-structure.com/Images/FBI1_tcm26-123089.jpg

http://www.ischool.washington.edu/lewis-hall/greenbuilding.aspx

http://www.fullscalearchitecture.com/press/wp-content/gallery/trevvett-images/trevvett_02.jpg

http://www.dennislawgroup.com/Green_Building_Laws_LEED.html

http://twgi.com/images/picIAMUenergyChartLarge.jpg

http://movetolakenorman.wordpress.com/2008/10/17/lake-norman-real-estate-leed-certification-may-add-value-to-your-home/

2 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. The article, “Risk of LEED Decertification Looms Large for Real Estate,” stated that “… a little known provision in LEED 2009, which allows LEED certifications to be challenged and removed at any time after they have been certified, presents a threat to all existing and future LEED 2009-certified projects.”

    “The idea that there is this new thing call decertification is inaccurate,” says Scot Horst, USGBC’s senior vice president for LEED. “The way LEED works is we have a rating system; you send us information about your project, and we certify to that. But let’s say that there was someone out there who lied about the prerequisite information or unintentionally provided inaccurate information. We have always had a policy to go back and say this wasn’t what it was represented to be. That is nothing new.”

    Potential ramifications of not meeting LEED’s prerequisites include losing a credit and potentially dropping to a lower LEED certification level. The only way you would ever lose a certification that you’ve already been awarded is if you didn’t meet the prerequisites of the system; USGBC currently does not evaluate or monitor the ongoing operations of a building, Horst adds.

    Comment by MULTIFAMILY EXECUTIVE 2010 — February 18, 2010 #

  2. USGBC sued over false advertising, fraud

    A class action lawsuit was filed October 8, 2010, in New York against the USGBC and its founders on behalf of “consumers, taxpayers, building design and construction professionals.” The $100-million lawsuit alleges fraud, unfair competition, deceptive trade practices, and false advertising, among other things. For more, including class members and a full list of allegations, view the official USGBC class-action complaint.

    Comment by Mother Nature Network — October 26, 2010 #

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Powered by Digital Shake LLC with WordPress