THE LOS ANGELES GREEN BUILDING ORDINANCE VS. CALIFORNIA’S OTHER GREEN CITIES
June 8, 2008 on 2:45 pm | In CHARTS + STATISTICS, FASCINATING INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE INFORMATION, FASCINATING INFORMATION, GREEN, New Developments, PROPERTY MAINTENANCE, Uncategorized |- THE LOS ANGELES GREEN BUILDING ORDINANCE VS. CALIFORNIA’S OTHER GREEN CITIES
- Being green means different things in different parts of the country. In places like St. Louis or Seattle, eco-friendly construction standards apply only to city-owned or city-funded buildings. In Boston green construction codes also apply to major commercial or residential developments. New York City has taken very bold steps, with 127 eco-friendly initiatives to green the city by 2030…to date, 14 cities and 1 state - Connecticut - require private developers to meet green building standards.
- Locally, in Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa recently signed into law the Los Angeles Green Building ordinance – and it is being heralded as “the most far reaching plan of any big city in America to promote green building practices in the private sector.” The ordinance would reduce the City’s carbon emissions by more than 80,000 tons by 2012, the equivalent of taking 15,000 cars off the road – this objective surpasses any other major city in the country. (Now if they’d only find a way get 15,000 cars off the road.)

- “Given that greenhouse gas emissions from buildings account for more than 40% of global warming pollution, the Los Angeles Green Building ordinance is a good first step towards building an energy-efficient, climate friendly, sustainable city,” observes Global Green USA President Matt Petersen. “While certainly not an end destination, it is important that Los Angeles has become the first big city to codify a private sector green building program.”
- Above and beyond, Mayor Villaraigosa has pledged to reduce the city’s carbon emissions 35% below 1990 levels by 2030 (Will he stay in office that long – which is longer than Tom Bradley’s mayorial rein - or will this pledge be adopted by forthcoming mayors?). The goal goes beyond the targets set in the Kyoto Protocol and is the greatest reduction target of any large US city. Logistically, a move such as this what necessitate curtailing L.A.’s coal-dependent municipal utility and a move toward electricity from renewable sources.
- The new standards go into effect Nov. 1st, for commercial projects and for high-rise residential development, and on May 1, 2009 for low-rise residential projects. It applies to existing buildings under certain conditions in redevelopment projects, and it outlines a host of other requirements for builders.
- The L.A. Green Building ordinance requires all projects at or above 50,000 square feet – or 50 units – comply with the general LEED-certified standard. The US Green Building Council awards LEED silver, gold and platinum certifications based on the level of environmental sustainability met by a developer.
- The City has agreed to work with builders to speed up approvals and to remove obstacles in the municipal code for elements of sustainable building design, such as green rooftops, cisterns and permeable pavement. City officials said about 150 new and renovated buildings, or about 7.5 million square feet, would be covered by the ordinance each year.
- “The world,” Villaraigosa said, “is following in our footsteps.”

- (See the previous posting Key Points of the Los Angeles Private Sector Green Building Ordinance for details.)
- In six months, the Los Angeles City Council will review and decide whether a stricter standard should be adopted. “We will continue to push the envelope,” said Council President Eric Garcetti. He said he expects that “in a couple of years, every single building over 25,000 square feet will be covered” by the new law. By this summer, he said, the city expects to raise the bar for its municipal construction to Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design “silver” — a higher standard that would match San Francisco’s threshold.
- L.A.’s Green Building ordinance raises the number of US municipalities that have enacted green building rules to somewhere around 120 and growing. California cities are enacting a variety of green building rules, as we will now share…
- SAN FRANCISCO
- Not considered part of Southern California, but worth mentioning for obvious reasons…
- San Francisco mayor, Gavin Newsom, has proposed an ordinance that some consider to be the most stringent green building requirements in the nation.
- The ordinance would require commercial and residential projects over 25,000 sf or 75 feet in height to meet the base level of LEED certification starting in 2008. Large commercial projects would have to achieve LEED Silver certification starting in 2009 and LEED Gold staring in 2010. Large residential projects would have to achieve LEED Silver starting in 2010. Mid-sized buildings would have to complete a LEED checklist but would not be required to achieve any LEED credits or points (the basis for the rating system) until 2009. Starting then, mid-size commercial buildings would have to achieve three LEED credits. The bar would be raised to four points in 2010, six points in 2011 and seven points in 2012.
- Small and mid-size residential projects, starting in 2009, would be required to achieve 25 points from GreenPointRated, a rating system of BuildItGreen, a professional nonprofit membership organization that promotes energy- and resource-efficient buildings in California. The hurdle would increase to 50 points in 2010 and then 75 points in 2011 or 2012. The earlier increase would occur for multifamily residential buildings with more than five units.
- Cumulative benefits this ordinance is expected to achieve through 2012 include: reducing CO2 emissions by 60,000 tons; saving 220,000 megawatt hours of power; saving 100 million gallons of drinking water; reducing waste and storm water by 90 million gallons of water; reducing construction and demolition waste by 700 million pounds; increasing the valuations of recycled materials by $200 million; reducing automobile trips by 540,000; and increasing green power generation by 37,000 megawatt hours.
- In addition, the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission has approved a new local subsidy for residents and businesses who install solar power. The solar incentive plan provides between $3,000 and $5,000 for a home installation and up to $10,000 for businesses. With existing state and federal incentives, the city subsidy could eliminate more than half the cost of a solar installation.
- “It’s groundbreaking,” notes San Francisco Assessor-Recorder Phil Ting, who assisted in the development the plan. “I think it will help ensure that San Francisco is going to be the solar capital of the world.”
- WEST HOLLYWOOD
- Last year, Newsweek magazine proclaimed that West Hollywood is the American city that can lay claim to the most comprehensive green building standards. This tiny city occupies 1.9-square-milea Los Angeles and boasts 37,000 people, making it the city with the highest population density west of the Mississippi. The West Hollywood ordinance, adopted in October 2007, grants special consideration to LEED-certified projects, establishes development standards for all new residential and commercial projects, in addition to remodels and tenant improvements. The only exemptions: duplexes and single-family homes.

- Requiring so many of the city’s real estate projects to meet green building standards puts West Hollywood in the forefront of the move to thrust eco-friendly design closer to the mainstream of architecture and planning.
- City officials reveal that thinking about smaller projects was the only way to make a big dent in West Hollywood’s carbon footprint. “We thought it was important to involve everybody [to be part of the solution],” noted councilmember Abbe Land, coauthor of the new ordinance.
- A set of rules, developed with the help of Global Green USA, insists that a project has earned at least 60 points (from a menu of 160 possible points) before developers are granted a city construction permit. Points are granted for planting canopy trees (5 points), using exposed concrete floors (5 points), bamboo or other rapidly renewable floors (up to 3 points), Cellulose wall insulation (2 points), Energy Star-certified lighting (3 points), energy-efficient windows and insulation (up to 15 points), tankless water heaters (2 points) and a green roof (8 points). Projects can earn up to 10 points (1 point per kilowatt) for using solar panels. In addition, all developers must meet mandatory requirements, such as reducing to 20 percent the construction waste they haul to the dump, making all roofs solar panel-ready, and using low-volatility paints and Energy Star appliances.
- Once they get to 90 points, developers can choose between eight incentives, including expedited permitting and variances, like approval of an extra housing unit.
- The new ordinance is tied to existing green building certification standards. Projects receiving “a minimum rating of ‘Certified’ with the United States Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) shall be exempt from the point requirements of the West Hollywood Green Building Program.”
- All projects scheduled for completion after October 1, 2007, must adhere to the provisions of Ordinance 07-762.
- It’s been calculated that West Hollywood’s green initiatives will add “roughly 10 percent” to the cost of construction.
- The city’s homegrown green plan is already drawing enquiries from other municipalities around the country. Global Green USA, which helped develop West Hollywood’s system, has already received calls from Henderson, Nev., Claremont, Calif., and McKinney, Texas.
- SANTA MONICA
- Above + beyond, Santa Monica wants to be the nation’s first “Net Zero” city. Through energy efficiency, solar and other renewable energy, the city envisions generating clean Santa Monica wants to be the nation’s first “Net Zero” city. Through energy efficiency, solar and other renewable energy, the city envisions generating clean energy that matches its total energy consumption.
- Energy and Green Building Program Administrator Susan Munves estimated that over 20 years, $1.4 billion is the probable investment required to achieve being a “Net Zero” city. This is likely to offset utility electric charges which would be higher than the $1.4 billion. The city will only invest a small part of that investment. The city’s primary role is facilitating and project management. The city offers a number of “carrots and sticks” to encourage broad participation.
-
Santa Monica’s 20 year plan would eliminate electricity produced by coal and natural gas power plants, and all the resulting greenhouse gas emissions.
- Santa Monica goes beyond clean electricity to be a city that models clean transportation. Over 80% of the city’s 519 vehicles are either alt-fuel or electric. 100 of Santa Monica’s Big Bus fleet is LNG, which they state is 77% cleaner than diesel. Liquid NG provides a 300 mile range. 88 buses run on B20 biodiesel. Only about 20 older buses run on standard diesel.
- OTHER CITIES
- Culver City, Beverly Hills, Inglewood, Long Beach, and Redondo Beach municipalities one and all – please enlighten the world to what your city is doing to help the environment.
- **
-
http://www.globest.com/news/1144_1144/losangeles/170228-1.html?type=pf
-
http://www.globalgreen.org/press/releases/2008_04_23_la_earthday.htm
-
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-green23apr23,0,4351806.story
-
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/01/09/BAG3UUBSL9.DTL
-
http://www.socalgreenrealestateblog.com/index.php?s=san+francisco
- http://www.socalgreenrealestateblog.com/?p=25
The City of Santa Monica has a commitment to “…Protecting the environment, improving quality of life, and promoting sustainability.”
· Historically, Santa Monica has had green building requirements for commercial, industrial, and residential project of four or more stories. In May, the City enacted new green building requirements to apply to all new construction in the city, including single-family and duplex residential projects.
· Some specific requirements include using solar heating to heat pools, limiting turfgrass (traditional sod) planting to 20% of the landscaping, diverting 65% of C&D waste from the landfill, and installing high efficiency irrigation systems. More detailed info can be found at www.smgreen.org.
· The City says, “The approved measures will lower the cost of home ownership, reduce the burden on the utility infrastructure, curtail the production of greenhouse gas emissions, and decrease the city’s overall water demand.”
Sources of information for this article include:
20 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Powered by Ground Zero
with WordPress

The EPA launched Energy Star in 1992 as a voluntary market-based partnership to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through increased energy efficiency. It has only recently become vogue.
Comment by Robb Crocker — June 8, 2008 #
[…] Original post by http://www.socalindustrialrealestateblog.com […]
Pingback by THE LOS ANGELES GREEN BUILDING ORDINANCE VS. CALIFORNIA’S OTHER GREEN CITIES · Real-Estate101.ExplainedOnline.Net — June 8, 2008 #
To be sure, there is an intuitive case for green ROI – energy efficient buildings perform better, have lower vacancies, less velocity and attract top rental dollars as they also tend to be class A or trophy structures. But where it counts for many developers–in financing, in cap rates–green building does not have a measurable impact. Right now, said Steve Gossett Jr., vice president of development for Transcend Equity, “there is no direct correlation between financing and green development.” The debate is still active in the finance community over whether a green building is lower risk and thus deserving of a lower cap rate, said Nicholas Stolatis, director of Strategic Initiatives for TIAA-CREF Global Real Estate.
Comment by Real Share — June 9, 2008 #
“We are in the process of adapting to LEED EB, which just came out 60 days ago and now we have to think about LEED 2009,” said Brenna Walraven, executive managing director, national property management, USAA Real Estate Co., and the current CEO of BOMA.
Comment by Brenna Walraven — June 9, 2008 #
Europe increasingly is going green in terms of property development. To do so, however, involves a number of challenges in terms of education and even in the creation of a Continental standard akin to the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification in the United States.
Comment by Debra Hazel — June 9, 2008 #
“Green buildings use durable materials that are salvaged, have recycled content or came from rapidly renewable resources. These materials significantly reduce the environmental destruction associated with the extraction, processing and transportation of virgin materials.”
The trouble is that the building codes enforced by this very same department often make it difficult or impossible to follow the advice. This is not just one city’s problem. Current building codes simply aren’t formulated to accommodate the reuse of salvaged materials, leaving well-intentioned green builders caught in a classic Catch-22: As a matter of public policy, many progressive cities encourage the recycling of building materials, yet as a matter of administrative practice they make their use either economically impractical or else outright illegal.
Comment by Arrol Gellner — June 26, 2008 #
Brokers working the Culver City office submarket describe it as a strategic and affordable Westside option. They point out that rents in the submarket typically average several dollars per sf per month less than rents at similar projects farther north.
Comment by Globe St. — July 24, 2008 #
Despite the blizzard of information to be had on the Internet, we architects seem to have a much lazier grasp of traditional design than did our predecessors. Today’s brand of pastiche strains to evoke the easy charm of tradition, but more often the result is plain old bedlam. It’s a far cry from our colleagues of the 1920s, who composed their “informal” designs with utmost care, and who always kept an eye on their faithful photographs.
Comment by Arrol Gellner — August 1, 2008 #
Real Estate House Of Representatives House Md…
I didn’t agree with you first, but last paragraph makes sense for me…
Trackback by Real Estate House Of Representatives House Md — August 12, 2008 #
With the phasing in of the new green standards, San Francisco city officials hope to achieve some significant metrics by the year 2012. These include: reducing annual greenhouse gas emissions by 60,000 tons; conserving 220,000 megawatt hours of electricity and 100 million gallons of drinking water; reducing waste and stormwater by 90 million gallons, reducing construction and demolition waste by 700 million pounds, increasing the valuation of recycled materials by $200 million, eliminating 540,000 automobile trips; and increasing clean power generation by 37,000 megawatt hours.
Comment by Builder Online — September 4, 2008 #
With the American National Standards Institute’s (ANSI) expected approval of the National Green Building Standard (NGBS), work is underway to integrate the new standard into local and national green building programs, municipal versions of the International Building Codes, and the memory banks of building inspectors nationwide.
Comment by National Green Building Standard — September 4, 2008 #
Good Morning, I am a buyer of Data Center Equipment and Generators; we also perform complete demo work for the removal of such equipment. Do you know of anyone who may have this type of real estate that we could get involved with?
I appreciate you taking the time to read this and maybe we can do some business together. We have no problem paying fees to assist in these projects with us. I look forward to hearing from you. Thanks, ED
Ed Padaigas
Director of Materials
DSA Encore, LLC
50 Pocono Rd.
Brookfield, Ct. 06804
Office:203-740-4237
Fax:203-419-0131
Mobile:203-994-5949
Email:epadaigas@dsaencore.com
Comment by DSA Encore, LLC — October 8, 2008 #
Green Key Real Estate is the first, and only, green real estate brokerage in the San Francisco Bay Area that is working towards solving environmental and social problems.
We share your values and goals for helping make the Bay Area sustainable by incorporating green principles and practices into all aspects of our real estate business.
http://www.greenkeyrealestate.com/
Comment by Green Key Real Estate — October 19, 2008 #
Would it surprise you to know that solar thermal (hot water generation) has a much faster financial breakeven and payback? Did you know it can be effectively used across the continental U.S.? Would it be of interest to you if the time needed for solar collection each day only required approximately four hours and had little-to-no issues due to shading, shadowing or low-light conditions?
If so, how about the idea that your cost for a solar thermal system can be as low as one third that of a photovoltaic system and very, very possibly last twice as long?
Comment by Richard Carter, Green Energy Cafe — December 3, 2008 #
SEPA Releases “Decoupling Utility Profits from Sales”
New White Paper Outlines Options for
Addressing Utility-Solar Disincentive
Washington, D.C–The Solar Electric Power Association (SEPA) is pleased to announce the release of the white paper, “Decoupling Utility Profits from Sales: Issues for the Photovoltaic Industry,” providing valuable insight into a regulatory policy option that addresses the business disincentive that some investor-owned utilities face when their customers install a solar electric system and, as a result, purchase less electricity from the utility. Decoupling changes the way a utility’s revenues are structured so that profits are no longer explicitly tied to electricity sales. The full report may be downloaded for free at http://www.solarelectricpower.org.
Comment by Josephine Mooney — February 2, 2009 #
Obama Administration Announces $3.2 Billion for Energy Efficiency Improvements
The Department of Energy has announced plans to invest $3.2 billion in energy efficiency and conservation projects in cities, counties, states, territories, and tribes.
The Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant program, funded by President Obama’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, will provide formula grants for projects that reduce total energy use and fossil fuel emissions, and improve energy efficiency nationwide.
The funding will support energy audits and energy efficiency retrofits in residential and commercial buildings, the development and implementation of advanced building codes and inspections, and the creation of financial incentive programs for energy efficiency improvements. Other activities eligible for use of grant funds include transportation programs that conserve energy, projects to reduce and capture greenhouse gas emissions, renewable energy installations on government buildings, energy efficient traffic signals and street lights, deployment of Combined Heat and Power and district heating and cooling systems, and others.
Get all the details @ http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/news/daily.cfm/hp_news_id=160
Comment by U.S. Department of Energy — April 4, 2009 #
Top 10 Renewable Cities
We present the Top 10 of US Cities that use renewable energies, according to SustainLane, this percentage is the amount of electricity that comes from renewable energies, such as solar energy.
1. Oakland, CA (17%)
2. Sacramento/SF/San Jose, CA (12%)
3. Portland, OR (10%)
4. Boston, MA (8.6%)
5. San Diego, CA (8%)
6. Austin, TX (6%)
7. Los Angeles, CA (5%)
8. Minneapolis, MN (4.5%)
9. Seattle, WA (3.5%)
10. Chicago, IL (2.5%)
Comment by SustainLane — April 24, 2009 #
San Francisco Passes Ordinance to Require Recycling and Composting
Recycling & Composting in San Francisco The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted 9-2 to approve Mayor Gavin Newsom’s proposal to require every residence and business in the city to have three separate color-coded bins for waste: blue for recycling, green for compost and black for trash, beginning this fall.
The recycling ordinance will greatly facilitate the LEED Material & Resources credits for building occupant recycling systems. With recycling required for all buildings, projects seeking LEED will not have to push for recycling areas to be included in a space, and for those seeking a certification under LEED for Existing Buildings: Operations & Maintenance, the task of getting occupants to actually recycle may become much easier. Not only will the recycling law hopefully improve the recycling of plastics, glass, metal, paper, and cardboard, but with San Francisco’s innovative compost collection program, the waste stream will be reduced even further. As occupants learn to compost their food waste rather than use a sink disposal system, wastewater will be reduced as well.
Comment by Liina Laufer — July 11, 2009 #
As cool as wind turbines are, I’ve got to tell you that I don’t think wind energy will ever supply more than a small percentage of our (human race) electricity needs. You just can’t get that much energy out of given amount of space. You’d have to have them just about everywhere. Still, it can, and should, be a part of a diversified energy strategy. We should keep at it. The cost-effectiveness of wind machines is increasing steadily.
Comment by FT Exploring — July 12, 2009 #
If we’re going to be able to add carbon capture and storage to our toolbox of ways to address climate change, the time to demonstrate it is right now — or yesterday, maybe…CO2 emissions are continuing to rise, and we’re seeing
impacts of climate change.
A climate bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives and up for debate
in the Senate would provide research money and incentive for companies to
work on the technology.
Comment by John D. Sutter — July 15, 2009 #